The individual treatment success rates are only 20 to 30% (1).
Patients suffering from Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) mostly require lifelong treatment (15).
Many of these therapies are administered parenterally and have been associated with adverse events such as serious infections or malignancy. This highlights a significant unmet medical need to minimize symptoms and promote GI healing. Although these treatments have generally benefited patients, there are significant challenges:
At present, the commonly used drugs for the treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) include immunosuppressive drugs , biological agents (infliximab and tacrolimus), and antibiotics (16).
5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) is widely used to treat IBD due to its good clinical efficacy (19).
Monoclonal cytokines such as Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor alfa (TNF-alfa) antibodies / Tumor Necrosis Factor alfa (TNF-alfa) inhibitors and Anti-Interleukin-6 (IL-6) antibodies can also treat Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), but the high production cost of this method makes it unacceptable for some patients (17).
Neutralizing cytokines is a recognized treatment for IBD (7). Agents that block cytokines, like TNF, suppress the immune system. These agents are clinically effective for patients with IBD (8).
Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF-alfa) have been the mainstay therapy for Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis (UC) for decades .Selecting and sequencing Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) therapies remains a clinical challenge. Disease phenotype, severity of symptoms, patient comorbidities, and prior drug exposure should be considered when considering therapy options. Anti-TNF remains a time-tested option that is effective in both UC and CD (5).
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic illness requiring optimal long-term medical therapy to enhance quality of life and reduce disease-related complications. Fine-tuning therapy is crucial to prevent treatment-related issues like infections and cancer. The relationship between immunosuppression, chronic inflammation, and cancer development in IBD patients is unclear, impacting physicians' confidence in prescribing and patients' confidence in medication adherence (9, 10, 11, 12, 13).
Despite significant advancements in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), a substantial percentage of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) still require effective and safe therapeutic options (3). Several drugs seem to alleviate symptoms associated with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD); however, maintaining long-term remission remains a challenge. Both clinicians and patients are in urgent need of new therapeutic strategies (4).
With growing need for highly effective therapy, various therapeutic targets have been introduced including anti-integrins, anti-interleukin (IL) 12/23, selective anti-IL23, Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors, sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators, and mRNA-124 splicing agent (5).
The Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) treatment option is beyond biologic agents widened with recent approvals of anti-integrins (e.g., Vedolizumab (L04AG05) and natalizumab) and sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators (e.g., ozanimod) (6).
The widespread use and potential impact of complementary and alternative medicine and the positive placebo effect (in clinical trials) indicate that exploring other psychological interventions may be an essential therapeutic complement to the conventional therapeutic approach in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) (18).
Current treatments for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) are not universally effective and have the potential for adverse events. The majority of currently available therapies target the mucosal immune response, and these therapies are hampered by incomplete efficacy and significant adverse events. Consequently, patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) often seek complementary and alternative therapies including Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT), dietary manipulation, naltrexone, and cannabis. Despite the popularity of these treatments, the evidence for benefit is limited (14).
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16) Wang et al. 2016g Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 5: CD000544
(17)
(18)
(19)
see also:
Brain-Gut-Microbiome-Axis / Gut-Brain Axis & Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)
Cancer / Tumors & Inflammation / Inflammatory diseases
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) & Crohn’s Disease (CD)
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) & Ulcerative Colitis (UC)
Ulcerative colitis (UC) & Drugs/Treatments